<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>LEGAL CASES</title>
        <link>http://priceperpound.info/forums/128</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ This forum will host any Legal Cases involving towing companies that I can find... I will try to provide information about the case and its outcome. ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ceco@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 08:33:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:37:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ BLACK v. FRANKLIN SERVICE STATIONS, INC.   (texas) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1353/BLACK-v-FRANKLIN-SERVICE-STATIONS-INC-texas-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <h1 class="pheads"><font face="Garamond">
<center><b>BLACK v. FRANKLIN SERVICE STATIONS, INC.</b></center></font></h1>
<h1>
<div style="MARGIN-TOP: 1em" class="pinfos"><font face="Garamond">
<center><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt"><b>Lawrence Black, Appellant, 
<div style="HEIGHT: 5px; FONT-SIZE: 0px"></div>v. 
<div style="HEIGHT: 5px; FONT-SIZE: 0px"></div>Franklin Service Stations, Inc., d/b/a J &amp; J Towing; and 7-Eleven Convenience Stores, Appellees.</b></span></center></font></div></h1>
<h1 class="pheads"><font face="Garamond">
<center><b>No. 03-11-00069-CV.</b></center></font></h1>
<h1 class="pheads"><font face="Garamond">
<center>Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin.</center></font></h1>
<p class="pheads"><font face="Garamond">
</font></p><center>
<h1 class="pheads"><font face="Garamond">
<center>Filed: September 30, 2011.</center></font></h1></center>
<p></p>
<div class="pinfos"><font face="Garamond">Before Justices Puryear, Rose and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1353</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:37:20 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ SABERI v. CAL-NEVADA TOWING   (California ) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1352/SABERI-v-CAL-NEVADA-TOWING-California-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <font face="Garamond">
<h1 class="pheads" align="left">
<center><b><font color="#ff0000" size="5"></font><br><font size="4"><font color="#ff0033">this deals with "DUE CARE and Good samaritan issues with tow trucks..</font><br></font><br><br>************************<br>SABERI v. CAL-NEVADA TOWING</b></center></h1></font><font face="Garamond">
<h1 style="MARGIN-TOP: 1em" class="pinfos">
<center><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt"><b>MAHNAZ SABERI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, </b></span></center></h1>
<h1 style="MARGIN-TOP: 1em" class="pinfos">
<center>
<div style="HEIGHT: 5px; FONT-SIZE: 0px"></div></center></h1>
<h1 style="MARGIN-TOP: 1em" class="pinfos">
<center>v. </center></h1>
<h1 style="MARGIN-TOP: 1em" class="pinfos">
<center>
<div style="HEIGHT: 5px; FONT-SIZE: 0px"></div></center></h1>
<h1 style="MARGIN-TOP: 1em" class="pinfos">
<center>CAL-NEVADA TOWING, Defendant and Respondent.</center></h1></font>
<h1 class="pheads"><font face="Garamond">
<center><b>No.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1352</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:22:05 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ HALL v. SPENCER COUNTY KENTUCKY  (Rotation list ) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1348/HALL-v-SPENCER-COUNTY-KENTUCKY-Rotation-list-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div class="caselawcontent searchable-content">
<center>
<h3 style="FONT-SIZE: 20px"></h3><b>
<p>
</p><h3>HALL v. SPENCER COUNTY KENTUCKY</h3>
<p></p>
<p>
</p><p>Mary L. HALL and Eugene Hall, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SPENCER COUNTY, KENTUCKY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.</p>
<p></p>
<p>No. 08-6455.</p>
<p>Argued:  Oct. 6, 2009. -- October 20, 2009 </p></b></center>Before:  MARTIN, COLE, and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges. <br>
<p>ARGUED:  David A. Friedman, Fernandez Friedman Haynes &amp; Kohn PLLC, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants.  David A. Cohen, McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie &amp; Kirkland, PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellees.   ON BRIEF:  David A. Friedman, Fernandez Friedman Haynes &amp; Kohn PLLC, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellants.  David A. Cohen, Stephen G. Amato, McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie &amp; Kirkland, PLLC, Lexington, Kentucky, for Appellees. </p>
<p>OPINION</p>
<p>Appellants Mary Lou and Eugene Hall, owners of a towing service, brought a 42 U.S.C.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1348</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:39:32 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ LONE STAR SECURITY VIDEO INC v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES  (California) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1347/LONE-STAR-SECURITY-VIDEO--v-CITY--LOS-ANGELES-California-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div class="caselawcontent searchable-content">
<center>
<h3 style="FONT-SIZE: 20px"></h3><b>
<p>
</p><h3>LONE STAR SECURITY VIDEO INC v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES</h3>
<p></p>
<p>
</p><p>LONE STAR SECURITY &amp; VIDEO, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, Fred Parks, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellant.</p>
<p>Lone Star Security &amp; Video, Inc., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. City of Los Angeles, Defendant-Appellee.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Nos. 07-56521, 07-56575.</p>
<p>Argued and Submitted May 7, 2009. -- October 21, 2009 </p></b></center>Before: B. FLETCHER, RAYMOND C. FISHER and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges. <br>
<p>Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney;  Laurie Rittenberg, Assistant City Attorney;  and Michael D. Nagle (argued), Deputy City Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellant-cross-appellee.George M. Wallace, Wallace, Brown &amp; Schwartz, Pasadena, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant. </p>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1347</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:34:05 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ American Trucking Association v Scheiner,  483 U.S. 266 (1987) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1340/American-Trucking-Association-v-Scheiner-483-U-S-266-1987-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div id="casecontent"><span class="headertext">
<h2>U.S. Supreme Court</h2>
<h3>Amer. Trucking Assns. v. Scheiner, 483 U.S. 266 (1987)</h3>
<p><b>American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Scheiner</b></p>
<p><b>No. 86-357</b></p>
<p><b>Argued April 28, 1987</b></p>
<p><b>Decided June 23, 1987</b></p>
<p><b>483 U.S. 266</b></p>
<p><b></b></p>
<p><em>APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA </em></p>
<p><em><em>Syllabus</em> </em></p>
<p>This case presents the question whether the Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution is violated by two Pennsylvania statutes which impose lump-sum annual taxes on the operation of trucks on Pennsylvania's highways. One challenged statute requires that an identification marker be affixed to every truck over a specified weight, and imposes an annual flat fee ($25 from 1980 through March 1983) for such marker. The statute exempts trucks registered in Pennsylvania by providing that the marker fee shall be deemed a part of the vehicle... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1340</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:03:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Helmrich Transportation Systems, Inc  v City of Philadephia ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1339/Helmrich-Transportation-Systems-Inc-v-City-of-Philadephia</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <center>
<h3 id="gsl_case_name"><b style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffc; COLOR: black">HELMRICH </b><b style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffc; COLOR: black">TRANSPORTATION </b><b style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffc; COLOR: black">SYSTEMS</b>, INC., et al.<br>v.<br><b style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffc; COLOR: black">CITY</b> OF <b style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffc; COLOR: black">PHILADELPHIA</b></h3></center>
<center>Civil Action No. 02-2233.</center>
<center>
<p><b>United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.</b></p></center>
<center>October 8, 2004.</center>
<p>
</p><h2>MEMORANDUM</h2>
<p></p>
<p>STEWART DALZELL, District Judge.</p>
<p>This case is the local exemplar of a national phenomenon. In the mid-1990s, Congress enacted a new law preempting certain local "motor carrier" regulations. Since then, towing companies across the country, from California to Missouri to New York, have challenged municipal towing ordinances as preempted by the federal law. Here, plaintiffs contend that the federal... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1339</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:58:31 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Auto Club of New York Inc, v. Dykstra ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1338/Auto-Club-of-New-York-Inc-v-Dykstra</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div class="caselawcontent searchable-content">
<center>
<h3 style="FONT-SIZE: 20px"></h3><b>
<p>
</p><h3>AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK INC v. DYKSTRA</h3>
<p></p>
<p>
</p><p>AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF NEW YORK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gretchen DYKSTRA, as commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York and City of New York, Defendants-Appellants.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Docket Nos. 06-1872-cv (L), 06-5243-CV (con).</p>
<p>Argued:  March 6, 2008. -- March 24, 2008 </p></b></center>Before:  MCLAUGHLIN and WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and COGAN, District Judge.* <br>
<p>Mordecai Newman, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, New York, N.Y. (Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, Larry A. Sonnenshein, Louise Moed, of counsel, on the brief), for Appellants.Erach Screwvala, Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese and Gluck, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Michael F. Fitzgerald, of counsel, on the brief), for Appellee.Peter B. O'Connell, Albany, N.Y. for Amici Curiae... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1338</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 21:54:20 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ DANNY TOWING INC LLC v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CRIME CONTROL PUBLIC SAFETY ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1335/DANNY-TOWING--LLC-v-NORTH-CAROLINA-DEPARTMENT--CRIME-CONTROL</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div class="caselawcontent searchable-content">
<center>
<h3 style="FONT-SIZE: 20px"></h3><b>
<p>
</p><h3>DANNY TOWING INC LLC v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CRIME CONTROL PUBLIC SAFETY</h3>
<p></p>
<p>
</p><p>DANNY'S TOWING 2, INC., Doyle Sutton d/b/a Doyle's Garage and Wrecker, Donnie Sutton d/b/a Sutton Automotive and Wrecker Service, Brenda Edwards d/b/a B &amp; H Towing, Ramdog Enterprises, LLC, James Autrey d/b/a Moe Bandy, Domestic Auto, Inc., Henry Grasty d/b/a Grasty's Service Center, Steve Miller d/b/a Rabbit Skin Wrecker, Thomas Sutton d/b/a Elk Towing, and Chris Higel d/b/a Anytime Towing, Plaintiffs, v. The NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CRIME CONTROL and PUBLIC SAFETY, and its agent, North Carolina Highway Patrol and Troop G, District V, Defendants.</p>
<p></p>
<p>No. COA10–1498.</p>
<p>-- July 19, 2011 </p></b></center><br>
<p>Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Hal F. Askins and Assistant Attorney General Tamara Zmuda, for... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1335</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:29:25 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Sergeants Towing Inc Vs City of Portland   (Oregon) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1332/Sergeants-Towing-Inc-Vs-City-of-Portland-Oregon-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sergeant's Towing, Inc. v. City of Portland
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>Oregon Court of Appeals
<br>
<br><br>
<br>
<br>Footnotes, docket and citations numbers available with purchase. 
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>April 04, 2001
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>SERGEANT'S TOWING, INC, AN OREGON CORPORATION; HANDY ANDY TOWING, INC., AN OREGON CORPORATION; OREGON TOWING CO., AN OREGON CORPORATION; AND SPEED'S AUTOMOTIVE, INC., AN OREGON CORPORATION DBA SPEED'S TOWING, INC., RESPONDENTS,
<br>
<br>v.
<br>
<br>CITY OF PORTLAND, BUREAU OF POLICE, APPELLANT.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County. 9806-04626 Ann L. Fisher, Judge pro tempore.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>Before Edmonds, Presiding Judge, and Armstrong and Kistler, Judges.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>The opinion of the court was delivered by: Armstrong, J.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>Argued and submitted November 12, 1999.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment that declares... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1332</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 22:00:46 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Neff Towing Service, Inc  vs United States Fire Insurnace Co  (Nebraska) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1331/Neff-Towing-Service--vs-United-States--Insurnace--Nebraska-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <strong>NEFF TOWING SERVICE, INC., APPELLEE,<br>v.<br>UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE 
CO., DOING BUSINESS THROUGH CRUM &amp; FORSTER INSURANCE, APPELLANT.</strong>
<p>Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: Gerald E. Moran, Judge. 
Reversed and remanded with directions.</p>
<p>Hendry, C.J., Wright, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, and Miller-Lerman, JJ.</p>
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT</p>
<p>1. Summary Judgment: Jurisdiction: Appeal and Error. Generally, the denial of 
a motion for summary judgment is not a final, appealable order. However, when 
adverse parties have each moved for summary judgment and the trial court has 
sustained one of the motions, the reviewing court obtains jurisdiction over both 
motions and may determine the controversy which is the subject of those motions 
or make an order specifying the facts which appear without substantial 
controversy and direct further proceedings as it deems just.</p>
<p>2. Declaratory Judgments: Appeal and Error. When... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1331</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:58:00 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Marshall's Towing vs Department of State Police  (Oregon) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1330/Marshall-s-Towing-vs-Department-of-State-Police-Oregon-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <h1><span id="cphMainContent_lblDocTitle">Marshall's Towing v. Dep't of State 
Police</span></h1>
<p><span id="cphMainContent_lblDocCourt">IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF 
OREGON<br><br></span></p>
<div id="cphMainContent_pnlBuyDocket">
<p><a class="showCaseToolTip" jquery1312426312577="5">Footnotes, docket and 
citations numbers available with purchase.</a> <br> 
</p></div><span id="cphMainContent_lblDocText" class="caseCopy">
<p><br>July 21, 2005<br><br><b>MARSHALL'S TOWING AND MARSHALL JENNINGS, 
PETITIONERS ON REVIEW,<br>v.<br>DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, RESPONDENT ON 
REVIEW.</b></p>
<p>On review from the Court of Appeals.*fn1 DSP 3011, 3018, 3058, CA 
A122558.</p>
<p>The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gillette, J.</p>
<p>En Banc</p>
<p>Argued and submitted June 21, 2005.</p>
<p>The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The order of the Oregon 
Department of State Police is reversed.</p>
<p>In this administrative law case, petitioners... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1330</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:54:26 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Fife Enterprises vs Washington State Patrol   (washington) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1329/Fife-Enterprises-vs-Washington-State-Patrol-washington-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fife Enterprises v. Washington State Patrol
<p><span id="cphMainContent_lblDocCourt">IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF 
WASHINGTON Division Three Panel Five<br><br></span></p>
<div id="cphMainContent_pnlBuyDocket">
<p><a class="showCaseToolTip" jquery1312426167236="5">Footnotes, docket and 
citations numbers available with purchase.</a> <br> 
</p></div><span id="cphMainContent_lblDocText" class="caseCopy">
<p><br>August 13, 2002<br><br><b>FIFE ENTERPRISES, D/B/A AABLE TOWING, DICK'S 
EAST TOWING, AND DICK'S TOWING, APPELLANTS,<br>v.<br>WASHINGTON STATE PATROL, 
RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.</b></p>
<p>Appeal from Superior Court of Chelan County Docket No: 012001315 Judgment or 
order under review Date filed: 09/20/2001 Judge signing: Hon. John E. 
Bridges</p>
<p>The opinion of the court was delivered by: Kurtz, J.</p>
<p>Concurring: John A. Schultheis, Stephen M. Brown</p>
<p>UNPUBLISHED OPINION</p>
<p>The Washington State Patrol (WSP) appoints qualifying tow... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1329</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:51:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Flennory vs Lichte  (Oregon) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1328/Flennory-vs-Lichte-Oregon-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <h1><span id="cphMainContent_lblDocTitle">Flennory v. Lichte</span></h1>
<p><span id="cphMainContent_lblDocCourt">IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 
THE DISTRICT OF OREGON<br><br></span></p>
<div id="cphMainContent_pnlBuyDocket">
<p><a class="showCaseToolTip" jquery1312425613902="5">Footnotes, docket and 
citations numbers available with purchase.</a> <br> 
</p></div><span id="cphMainContent_lblDocText" class="caseCopy">
<p><br>October 25, 2006<br><br><b>ROY LIONEL FLENNORY, PLAINTIFF,<br>v.<br>PETER 
LICHTE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.</b></p>
<p>The opinion of the court was delivered by: Panner, Judge</p>
<p>OPINION AND ORDER</p>
<p>Plaintiff Roy Flennory, appearing pro se, brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action 
against defendants Peter Lichte,<a  rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://or.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CFDCT%5CDOR%5C2006%5C20061025_0000512.DOR.htm/qx#D*fn1" name="S*fn1">*fn1</a> Rene Bravo, 
Raul Ramirez, Dick Myer, All Around... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1328</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 21:49:07 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ CSX Transportation vs Alabama Department of Revenue (diesel fuel tax ruling) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1306/CSX-Transportation-vs-Alabama-Department--Revenue-diesel-fue</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This case has to do with taxing the railroad for diesel fuel purchases by the State of Alabama...<br><br>Kind of interesting and somewhat applies since they cite motor cargo transportation..<br><br>*********************************************************<br><br><br class="clear">
<div id="middle"><br class="clear">
<div id="supctcontent"><br class="clear">
<div class="breathe"><br class="clear"><a name="content"></a>
<table class="sb" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption class="sbcasename" colspan="3">CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. ALABAMA DEPT. OFREVENUE ( No. 09-520 ) <span class="offcite"></span><br>350 Fed. Appx. 318, reversed and remanded. </caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th class="sblabels"><span class="writnav"><b>Syllabus</b> <br><br></span></th>
<th class="sblabels"><span class="writnav"><b>Opinion</b> <br>[Kagan]<br></span></th>
<th class="sblabels"><span class="writnav"><b>Dissent</b> <br>[Thomas]<br></span></th></tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="sbrefs"><a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1306</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:53:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Spurgeon v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's (important insurance liability ruling) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1261/Spurgeon-v-Certain-Underwriters--Lloyd-s-important-insurance</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><span id="lblDocName" class="text"><br><br><br></span></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><span id="lblDocCourt" class="text">IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT MARTINSBURG<br><br></span></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><a id="lnkDocket" class="linkblackmediumbold">Docket Number available at www.versuslaw.com</a><br></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><a id="lnkCite" class="linkblackmediumbold">Citation Number available at www.versuslaw.com</a> </td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="text" valign="top"><br>January 2, 2008<br><br><b>MELVYN D. SPURGEON, PLAINTIFF,<br>v.<br>CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON, DEFENDANT.</b><br><br>ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT<br><br>On this day, the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1261</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:00:01 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ DYER v. SUPERIOR COURT HASOU  (driver injured on job by motorist) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1248/DYER-v-SUPERIOR-COURT-HASOU-driver-injured--job--motorist-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div class="caselawcontent" sizset="23" sizcache="0">
<center>
<h3 style="FONT-SIZE: 20px"></h3><b>
<p>
</p><h3>DYER v. SUPERIOR COURT HASOU</h3>
<p></p>
<p>
</p><p>Hollis O. DYER, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Moufeed O. HASOU, Real Party in Interest.</p>
<p></p>
<p>No. B110144.</p>
<p>-- June 30, 1997 </p></b></center><br>
<p> Fonda &amp; Hilberman, Joe W. Hilberman, Los Angeles, and David L. Scott, for Petitioner.No appearance for Respondent.Girardi and Keese, John A. Girardi, Los Angeles, and John Roberts for Real Party in Interest. </p>
<p>Petitioner Hollis O. Dyer's motion for summary judgment was denied on real party in interest Moufeed O. Hasou's action for negligence against Dyer. Dyer seeks a writ directing the trial court to vacate the denial of summary judgment and to enter a new order granting the motion, as well as judgment in Dyer's favor.   We grant the petition for writ of mandate.</p>
<p>FACTS</p>
<p>The parties... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1248</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:50:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ SCHLIMGEN v. MAY TRUCKING COMPANY (tow truck driver killed on job) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1247/SCHLIMGEN-v-MAY-TRUCKING-COMPANY-tow-truck-driver-killed--jo</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div class="caselawcontent" sizset="23" sizcache="0">
<center>
<h3 style="FONT-SIZE: 20px"></h3><b>
<p>
</p><h3>SCHLIMGEN v. MAY TRUCKING COMPANY</h3>
<p></p>
<p>
</p><p>Joseph SCHLIMGEN, Personal Representative for the Estate of Michael F. Schlimgen, deceased, Respondent, v. MAY TRUCKING COMPANY, Appellant.</p>
<p></p>
<p>9803-02267;  A107409.</p>
<p>-- September 10, 2003 </p></b></center>Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges. <br>
<p>Gordon T. Carey, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.Michael T. Garone, Portland, argued the cause for respondent.   With him on the brief were Karen O'Kasey and Schwabe, Williamson &amp; Wyatt, P.C., Bend. </p>
<p sizset="23" sizcache="0">This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court.  Schlimgen v. May Trucking Co., 335 Or. 143, 61 P.3d 923 (2003).   In our original decision, we held that the trial court erred in denying defendant's motion for a mistrial;  that motion... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1247</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:44:47 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ STATE v. PECK  (Ohio snatch block case) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1246/STATE-v-PECK-Ohio-snatch-block-case-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div class="caselawcontent">
<center>
<h3 style="FONT-SIZE: 20px"></h3><b>
<p>
</p><h3>STATE v. PECK</h3>
<p></p>
<p>
</p><p>The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. PECK, Appellant.</p>
<p></p>
<p>No. 06AP-500.</p>
<p>-- June 05, 2007 </p></b></center><br>
<p>Ron O'Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kimberly M. Bond, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.Robert F. Krapenc, for appellant. </p>
<p> {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, William L. Peck, appeals from a judgment of conviction entered by the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas.   Because appellant's conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence, we reverse that judgment and enter judgment for appellant.</p>
<p>{¶ 2} On the evening of January 13, 2005, Charles Starkes was driving a tractor-trailer (a tractor with two attached trailers) on I-270 near Columbus, Ohio.   His tractor weighed about 34,000 pounds and his two trailers were loaded with almost 30,000 pounds of materials, for a combined weight... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1246</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:40:05 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Schilier Vs Rice   (Pennsylvania) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1236/Schilier-Vs-Rice-Pennsylvania-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div id="pnlViewer">
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><span id="lblDocName" class="text">Schlier v. Rice<br><br></span></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><span id="lblDocCourt" class="text">IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA<br><br></span></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><a id="lnkDocket" class="linkblackmediumbold">Docket Number available at www.versuslaw.com</a><br></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><a id="lnkCite" class="linkblackmediumbold">Citation Number available at www.versuslaw.com</a> </td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="text" valign="top"><br>December 15, 2009<br><br><b>JIMMY A. SCHLIER, PLAINTIFF,<br>v.<br>CAPT. JOHN G. RICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.</b><br><br>The opinion of the court was delivered by: A. Richard Caputo... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1236</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:15:45 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Schilier Vs Rice   (Pennsylvania) ]]></title>
			<link>http://priceperpound.info/topic/1235/Schilier-Vs-Rice-Pennsylvania-</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <div id="pnlViewer">
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><span id="lblDocName" class="text">Schlier v. Rice<br><br></span></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><span id="lblDocCourt" class="text">IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA<br><br></span></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><a id="lnkDocket" class="linkblackmediumbold">Docket Number available at www.versuslaw.com</a><br></td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td valign="top"><a id="lnkCite" class="linkblackmediumbold">Citation Number available at www.versuslaw.com</a> </td></tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="5%">&nbsp;</td>
<td class="text" valign="top"><br>December 15, 2009<br><br><b>JIMMY A. SCHLIER, PLAINTIFF,<br>v.<br>CAPT. JOHN G. RICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.</b><br><br>The opinion of the court was delivered by: A. Richard Caputo... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ibflat2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://priceperpound.info/topic/1235</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:15:32 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
